- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@zoy.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:26:21 +0900
- To: Jean-Guilhem Rouel <jean-gui@w3.org>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Sijtsche Smeman <sijtschesmeman@wanadoo.nl>
On Dec 15, 2006, at 00:57 , Jean-Guilhem Rouel wrote: > Hi, > > Another suggestion would be to produce a warning only if its level > corresponds to what the user asked. That would avoid the > computation of a lot of warnings and a simple warnings.size() (or > something like that) would be enough to get the number of warnings. Sounds like a good idea. Minor problem: there would be no way to tell the user "there were other warnings, not shown here." with a link to the validation with all warnings. I suppose the Warnings class could keep a count of ignored warnings, too. Your proposed solution would fix the problem at hand, and also http:// www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4081 Would you have a free hour to hack it up? :) (no, it's not *so* urgent, but we're releasing on monday, and having this would be very cool.) -- olivier
Received on Friday, 15 December 2006 08:26:35 UTC