W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > November 2005

Re: Markup Validator: group categories of errors

From: Antonio Cavedoni <antonio@cavedoni.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:42:04 +0100
Message-Id: <DDA7F3E7-4E4B-49D3-B1AF-DBB617123D14@cavedoni.org>
To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>

On 9 Nov 2005, at 15:40, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:58, you wrote:
>> That would be less hostile than a wall of similar-looking errors, I
>> think, and would make the page much more light and eye-scannable.
>> What does everyone think?
> Different people have different preferences.  So offer them a choice!

True, but too many options = too much complexity. An app like the  
validator shouldn’t have too many switches, methinks.

> What I guess you're getting at is the difference between "compact"
> or "verbose" on the one hand and "listed" or "DOM" view on the
> other in AccessValet.

Sorry, I don’t understand/know what the AccessValet is.
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2005 15:42:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:36:26 UTC