- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 07:58:20 +0100
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> wrote: >Would they allow instance B to check instance A, and recursively? Any page output by “check” would include the header field and the value would be the level of the recursion; regardless of which instance of “check”. That is, when “check” is processing e.g. yahoo.com it will set it to “1”. If you click the «/referer» link “check” will be processing its own output, which will contain the value “1”, and will increase it in its own output to “2”. So two separate copies of “check” will see each other's recursion level and increase it. In fact, it would be hard to prevent them from seeing the other's recursion level; but they could of course have different settings for maximum allowable recursion depth. - -- When I decide that the situation is unacceptable for me, I'll simply fork the tree. I do _not_ appreciate being enlisted into anyone's holy wars, so unless you _really_ want to go _way_ up in my personal shitlist don't play politics in my vicinity. -- Alexander Viro on lkml -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 iQA/AwUBQgcRi6PyPrIkdfXsEQKvAgCgpfmvCebAXgmgraNgOsOtkFElV7IAoK1y xtc3MRo3e7IOxU0d6rm2M2x/ =xGNn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 7 February 2005 06:58:25 UTC