* Terje Bless wrote: >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator-cvs/2004Sep/0002.html > >This should definitely be brought forward to HEAD as well. I can do another >merge from the branch when we're getting closer to a 0.7.0 release. There are only two patches on this branch, of which one >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator-cvs/2004Sep/0021.html > >This one was presumably intentional; this issue in Bugzilla was targetted for >fixing in both 0.6.x and HEAD. has a different (more correct) patch in HEAD already. >As alluded to elsewhere, 0.6.x might as well keep getting minor fixes if folks >have the time and inclination, or we need fast changes to what's running on >v.w.o. Until 0.7.0 is running on :80 it's the cleanest way of making these >minor fixes. An expensive way though.Received on Saturday, 11 September 2004 22:55:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:12:44 GMT