- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:50:56 +0900
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2004 03:51:02 UTC
On the topic of multiple SGML/XML parsers. Henry S. Thompson wrote: > It's really not a great idea to > keep trying to make openSP be a fully-compliant XML validator when > there is a _tiny_ user/developer community for it in that role, > compared to the huge amount of effort which is put into the top 3 or 4 > XML validators. I would recommend rxp, since it's open source, fast, > produces good error messages and is a Univ. of Edinburgh product owned > and operated by Richard Tobin, member of the XML Core WG, but any of > the validators which did well in Rusty Harold's conformance > comparison, reported at XML Europe 2004, would do. -- olivier
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2004 03:51:02 UTC