- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:18:12 +0200
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com> wrote: >On Tue, 18 May 2004, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >>My .02?: remove the catalog fallback in 0.6.6, try to find a >>non-disruptive way to re-enable the functionality for 0.7.0. > >So long as the headline message tells the user their document "is/isn't >valid foo", I'd strongly agree that we can't allow foo to take a default >value. > >If the headline changes to "pass|fail validation as foo", we're no >longer telling a lie when the document isn't actually foo. Hmmm. That might make sense in general too. But note that the difference is slight, and probably won't make much difference in practice; my guess is that it'll be far too subtle a distinction for the users (who lack the context). Opinions? Ville? - -- If you believe that will stop spammers, you're sadly misled. Rusty hooks, rectally administered fuel oil enemas, and the gutting of their machines, *that* stops spammers! -- Saundo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 iQA/AwUBQKsKM6PyPrIkdfXsEQITmwCgtm3oaGuftSihXFNeF69G8lT/oBUAn31x UuGN+mg9bj8vpmo2JXr/Pdip =Xvu+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:18:17 UTC