W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > March 2004

Re: New checklink for testing

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:05:52 +0200
To: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
Cc: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>, public-qa-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <b02010202-1033-0653266D80C111D88FAF0030657B83E8@[193.157.66.23]>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi> wrote:

>After this is uploaded to CPAN, I will create also RPMs of it.  At that
>point, I'll revise the validator installation instructions and the RPM
>package, removing checklink from it to avoid conflicts.  What do you
>think, should we remove the old checklink from the validator CVS tree?

Yes. Having a tale copy in CVS is guaranteed to generate more confusion than
any other possible resolution. We can put huge pointers in the relevant places
to make sure people can find it.

- -- 
We've gotten to the point where a human-readable, human-editable text format
for structured data has become a complex nightmare where somebody can safely
say  "As many threads on xml-dev have shown, text-based processing of XML is
hazardous at best"  and be perfectly valid in saying it.     -- Tom Bradford

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3

iQA/AwUBQGbbvqPyPrIkdfXsEQLHwwCfQsB+ZdAtnWliceKY1U+Q6jSVfXkAoPhL
ipcLr4kXUzQPTIOLQQiAYEmq
=acDT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sunday, 28 March 2004 09:06:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:12:44 GMT