- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:21:39 +0900
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 05:03 Asia/Tokyo, Terje Bless wrote: > Ok. Since nobody is yelling "WAIT", I'll move ahead with that at some > point > during the next 24-48 hours. As said on IRC, after discussion with Martin on the i18n code, "go ahead". Let's give ourselves 24 hours for details (e.g announcement, choosing targets etc) and do it. > I don't want to involve Comms in this for the beta Ok, good. > , but anything coming > from @w3.org is going to catch more eyes then @pobox.com so if you > want to > take on that bit it would be great. My initial thought of where to > send an > announcement includes: > www-validator > www-html > Zeldman (since people keep quoting him at me) I can do those easily, others if you want (e.g math and ER WGs). > If anyone has more ideas then please do holler! I think I'd also post a note (maybe not the full announcement, but a link to it) to the EO list (public-evangelist), plus (obviously) the W3C team. > Below is a first cut of a release announcement: Minor comments inline. > If you have somehow managed to find a "Mission > Critical" use for the MarkUp Validator you are insane and should > probably > be restrained to prevent doing harm to yourself. :-) Hmm hmm. At least I'd be very clear that the danger is in the beta one. I don't want to carry the message that the validator is not reliable. > * The new design for the web interface and the website. I'd rather avoid the word "design". Discussing the UI will be interesting, but I don't really want people to argue to death about colour, shapes, style etc. > * The documentation (Yes, Virginia, there really _is_ documentation > for the MarkUp Validator!). :) [snip, the rest is fine] -- Olivier
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 21:21:42 UTC