- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 10:51:41 +0100
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
- cc: Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org>, Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> wrote: >On Monday, Dec 2, 2002, at 18:10 Asia/Tokyo, Gerald Oskoboiny wrote: >>BTW, if I notice small things like typos, should I go ahead and commit >>changes myself, or send bug reports here? Either is fine with me. >>(doing the commits directly seems more efficient) > >It's certainly OK if you commit changes yourself. However, since the >code has been branched and all, it's probably better if you discuss it a >bit, either on IRC or on the public-qa-dev list (it's closed to >subscription, but feel free to add yourself), beforehand. Hmm. And given that /source/ now points at the wrong branch we should probably try to document the CVS branch practice. FYI Ger, CVS HEAD is now "unstable" and stabilization towards a release goes onto a branch. Currently we're at "validator-0_6_0-branch", with 0.6.1 (CVS Tag "validator-0_6_1-release) just out the door and, it looks like, a 0.6.2 release soon to follow. -- When I decide that the situation is unacceptable for me, I'll simply fork the tree. I do _not_ appreciate being enlisted into anyone's holy wars, so unless you _really_ want to go _way_ up in my personal shitlist don't play politics in my vicinity. -- Alexander Viro on lkml
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 04:51:48 UTC