Testing MathML spec on https://labs.w3.org/pubrules

With a view to moving future editors drafts to being compatible with
Echidna, I thought I'd try validating the existing MathML REC [1] with
the experimental pubrules checker[2]

It failed a few things, before adjusting the editors' drafts
of MathML, I thought I'd ask what the tool is really looking for,
or if the document is OK and the tool could be adjusted.


* headers.errata says errata not found
There is a link to the errata just below the authors in the frontmatter.

* headers.dl says Latest Version missing
as previously agreed, the spec has two latest version links

Latest MathML 3 version:
Latest MathML Recommendation:


* headers.translations says we should use
http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Translations/byTechnology?technology=MathML3
rather than
http://www.w3.org/2005/11/Translations/Query?titleMatch=MathML3
(I can change it if that information is correct, just asking:-)

* sotd.mailing-list says no mailing list link
the SOTD has a mailto: link and links to the www-math list archives and
to the list subscription page?


* sotd.processDocument
This is I think a new requirement, can add.



David


[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3/

[2]
https://labs.w3.org/pubrules/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FMathML3%2F&profile=REC&validation=simple-validation&noRecTrack=false&informativeOnly=false&echidnaReady=false&patentPolicy=pp2004&processDocument=2005


The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:

Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Microsoft Office 365.

Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2015 15:18:32 UTC