W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pubrules-comments@w3.org > April 2015

Testing MathML spec on https://labs.w3.org/pubrules

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:17:41 +0100
Message-ID: <551C0C15.20709@nag.co.uk>
To: <public-pubrules-comments@w3.org>
With a view to moving future editors drafts to being compatible with
Echidna, I thought I'd try validating the existing MathML REC [1] with
the experimental pubrules checker[2]

It failed a few things, before adjusting the editors' drafts
of MathML, I thought I'd ask what the tool is really looking for,
or if the document is OK and the tool could be adjusted.

* headers.errata says errata not found
There is a link to the errata just below the authors in the frontmatter.

* headers.dl says Latest Version missing
as previously agreed, the spec has two latest version links

Latest MathML 3 version:
Latest MathML Recommendation:

* headers.translations says we should use
rather than
(I can change it if that information is correct, just asking:-)

* sotd.mailing-list says no mailing list link
the SOTD has a mailto: link and links to the www-math list archives and
to the list subscription page?

* sotd.processDocument
This is I think a new requirement, can add.




The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:

Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Microsoft Office 365.
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2015 15:18:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 1 April 2015 15:18:33 UTC