Re: ISO Time frame (was Re: Meeting minutes 2017-06-06)

+1

Paul
—
Paul Belfanti
Vice President, Production, Manufacturing & Content Architecture
Ascend Learning
(w) 978.639.3536
(m) 201.783.4884


From: Cristina Mussinelli <cristina.mussinelli@aie.it>
Date: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 11:01 AM
To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: ISO Time frame (was Re: Meeting minutes 2017-06-06)
Resent-From: <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 11:02 AM

Dear Leonard
Thank you very much, really very useful ☺

Cristina





[cid:image001.jpg@01D2DF7F.7E64C6A0]<http://fondazionelia.org/sostienici/dona>

________________________________
ASSOCIAZIONE ITALIANA EDITORI - C.so di Porta Romana 108 - 20122 MILANO - Tel. 0289280800  - Fax 0289280860
Uffici di Roma - Via Crescenzio 19 - 00193 Roma - Tel. 0695222100 - Fax 0695222101
Sito Internet: www.aie.it<http://www.aie.it/> - Posta elettronica certificata: aie-pec@pec.aie.it<mailto:aie-pec@pec.aie.it>
________________________________
Confidentiality Notice
Il presente messaggio, e ogni eventuale documento a questo allegato, potrebbe contenere informazioni da considerarsi strettamente riservate ad esclusivo utilizzo del destinatario in indirizzo, il quale e' l'unico autorizzato ad usarlo, copiarlo e, sotto la propria responsabilita', diffonderlo. Chiunque ricevesse questo messaggio per errore o comunque lo leggesse senza esserne legittimato e' avvertito che trattenerlo, copiarlo, divulgarlo, distribuirlo a persone diverse dal destinatario e' severamente proibito ed e' pregato di darne notizia immediatamente al mittente oltre che cancellare il messaggio e i suoi eventuali allegati dal proprio sistema. Le opinioni espresse nel messaggio sono quelle proprie del mittente, se non diversamente e specificatamente dichiarato dal mittente stesso.

This message, and any attached file transmitted with it, contains information that may be confidential or privileged for the sole use of the intended recipient who only may use, copy and, under his responsibility, further disseminate it. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail or read it without entitlement be advised that keeping, copying, disseminating or distributing this message to persons other than the intended recipient is strictly forbidden. You are to notify immediately to the sender and to delete this message and any file attached from your system. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states otherwise.
________________________________


Da: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Data: mercoledì 7 giugno 2017 16:53
A: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
Oggetto: ISO Time frame (was Re: Meeting minutes 2017-06-06)
Rinviato da: <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
Data rinvio: mercoledì 7 giugno 2017 16:54

I just want to comment on the comment from the minutes that the timeframe will be “about 1 year”.

One year is pretty much the minimum for a standard process.  This assumes two review periods (CD then DIS) and assumes that ZERO technical comments are received on the document during either review period.  If any technical comments are received on the CD, then you add a minimum of 3 months for an additional CD review period.   (and then repeat until you believe that no more technical comments will be received, at which point you go to DIS.)

To be more specific, the process looks like:

  *   Submit New Work Item (NWI) Committee Draft (CD)
  *   Document is out for 12 week review
  *   ISO committee needs to meet to review/dispose the comments
     *   Normally this will happen at standard face to face meetings throughout the year, though a special “phone meeting” can be called with enough notice BUT requires a minimum number (5) of Participating (P) country/member bodies to be present to conduct business
  *   Based on the resolution of comments, either a second CD OR a Draft International Standard (DIS) is produced and sent for review
     *   CD will require minimum 8 week review
     *   DIS requires a 20 week (5 month) review
  *   ISO committee needs to meet to review/dispose the comments
  *   If a CD had been done, then you would now (hopefully!) go to DIS (though may end up with another CD)
  *   If DIS was successful without any technical comments, document can go direct to publication
  *   If DIS received technical comments, then a Final DIS (FDIS) would need to be produced (and then needs an 8 week review + meeting)
  *   Once FDIS is approved, then its “off to publication”

(I need to make a flowchart of this ☺)

Hope that helps.

Leonard

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 5:44 AM
To: W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
Subject: Meeting minutes 2017-06-06
Resent-From: <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 09:44:21 +0000

The minutes are here:

https://www.w3.org/2017/06/06-pbg-minutes.html


Cheers

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/

mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704






CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including attachments, if any, is intended for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, privileged, and/or proprietary material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.