W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: prov-dm normative sections (ISSUE-495)

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:12:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJCyKRp50dP9+Rh=asHp4MjkyRne4Se914wN_vt54RFQ_SPdQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1

Paul

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> In his review of prov-dm (ISSUE-495), Ivan asked which sections were
> normative.
> I propose to introduce the following section
>
> 1.1 Compliance with this document.
>
> For the purpose of compliance, the normative sections of this document
> are sections 2 and 5, and appendix A.  Information in tables is
> normative if it appears in a normative section. UML diagrams (figure 1,
> 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) are informative. Text in boxes labeled "Example"
> is informative.
>
> Do we have support for this?
>
> Luc
>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>
>



-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
  Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 15:12:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 26 September 2012 15:12:53 GMT