W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-549: XML Schema Bundle vs. NamedBundle [XML Serialization]

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:36:32 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|5946e7c4c2f01388dbb2a966eb41adc3o89HaZ08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|504E1710.3040206@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Curt,

Following discussion in prov-constraints/prov-n, we are going to rename 
the toplevel bundle
a prov document, wheres the bundle (named set of statements) should 
remain bundle.

If we follow the same terminology, old:NamedBundle should become new:Bundle
and old:Bundle should become new:Document.

BTW Your suggestion would allow arbitrary levels of nesting of bundles, 
which we don't want.


Cheers,
Luc


On 09/10/2012 05:32 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-549: XML Schema Bundle vs. NamedBundle [XML Serialization]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/549
>
> Raised by: Curt Tilmes
> On product: XML Serialization
>
> What is the rationale for distinguishing Bundle vs. NamedBundle in the
> current XSD Schema?
>
> Why not just have an optional prov:id on Bundle and just have one type?
>
>
>
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 16:37:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 September 2012 16:37:01 GMT