W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: future-proofing prov-o.owl (and "namespace concatenation")

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:20:23 -0500
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org WG" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <761D2CA8-CAC1-48A3-91E0-306524110805@rpi.edu>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
>>>>> I wonder whether we should not use extension-less URI-s everywhere, eg, http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120724, and let conneg work to choose among RDF/XML or turtle versions.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> That is what I would prefer. But I think we're bending certain ways to help the bad tooling that is out there.
>>>> The tradeoff that is in place is to point to the extension less URIs using specializationOf.
>>> 
>>> You mean that is what you will do (at the moment, all the URI-s have an extension)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I meant that I would prefer to not use extension-less URI-s everywhere and let conneg work.
>> Are you saying to just do it that way?
>> 
> 
> That would be my preference, unless we hit some practical issue.
> 
> Ivan


Great. Then I'll press forward with that.

prov-wg, speak now or forever hold your peace….

-Tim
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:20:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:20:55 GMT