W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: future-proofing prov-o.owl (and "namespace concatenation")

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:10:03 +0100
Message-ID: <98D7BFE8-61B1-4181-8789-459B104D7127@vu.nl>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org WG" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Love the conneg

On Nov 20, 2012, at 19:20, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:

>>>>>> I wonder whether we should not use extension-less URI-s everywhere, eg, http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120724, and let conneg work to choose among RDF/XML or turtle versions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> That is what I would prefer. But I think we're bending certain ways to help the bad tooling that is out there.
>>>>> The tradeoff that is in place is to point to the extension less URIs using specializationOf.
>>>> 
>>>> You mean that is what you will do (at the moment, all the URI-s have an extension)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I meant that I would prefer to not use extension-less URI-s everywhere and let conneg work.
>>> Are you saying to just do it that way?
>> 
>> That would be my preference, unless we hit some practical issue.
>> 
>> Ivan
> 
> 
> Great. Then I'll press forward with that.
> 
> prov-wg, speak now or forever hold your peaceā€¦.
> 
> -Tim
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:11:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:11:45 GMT