W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]

From: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:58:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOMwk6xbW815XJ=ZV=XoamfnTPkw0EP+d7rZyUkP1mPsWyC5Jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Luc,
Thanks for making the change and closing the issue!

Best,
Satya

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote:

> **
> Hi all,
>
> The changes have been implemented. I am now closing this issue pending
> review.
>
> Regards,
> Luc
>
>
> On 05/24/2012 03:46 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
> Hi Tim, Paolo,
>
> There was no response about my suggestion, but a similar suggestion
> was made by Paolo, in prov-n document [1].
>
> So, I have made entity optional in usage (in prov-dm) [2] and update the
> grammar in prov-n [1].
>
> Paolo, can you update the example in [1]?
>
> Thanks,
> Luc
>
> [1]
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-n.html#expression-Usage
> [2]
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Usage
>
> On 05/24/2012 01:28 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>
> Luc, Satya,
>
>  This issue was reassigned to DM from the "dm-provrdf mapping" product.
>
>  Where do we stand on this "asymmetry" between an optional activity on
> Generation but not Usage.
>
>  Thanks,
> Tim
>
>   On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
>
> Hi Satya,
> Then, the equivalent would be to make the entity of a usage optional (i.e.
> the object of involvement).
> We can do it, if people feel it's appropriate.
> Luc
>
> On 06/03/2012 15:43, Satya Sahoo wrote:
>
> Hi Luc,
> The issue is about having activity id as optional for Generation and not
> for Usage - this is distinct from id of the Generation and Usage record id.
>
>  Thanks.
>
>  Best,
> Satya
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Generation and usage have both optional id:
>>
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Generation
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Usage
>>
>> Luc
>>
>>
>> On 05/03/12 13:45, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>
>>> PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm<->
>>>  prov-o]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/288
>>>
>>> Raised by: Satya Sahoo
>>> On product: mapping prov-dm<->  prov-o
>>>
>>>     If activity id is optional for generation record, why is it not so
>>> for usage record? These two points need to be reconciled either way. (Satya)
>>>
>>>     Similar to generation, time can be "folded" into the "attribute"
>>> list. (Satya)
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Usage
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2012 14:59:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 May 2012 14:59:05 GMT