W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:10:20 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|e5a8da60fbb49080c77e5695202056ado4YBC808L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FC5F20C.6060508@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
CC: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi all,

The changes have been implemented. I am now closing this issue pending 
review.

Regards,
Luc

On 05/24/2012 03:46 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
> Hi Tim, Paolo,
>
> There was no response about my suggestion, but a similar suggestion
> was made by Paolo, in prov-n document [1].
>
> So, I have made entity optional in usage (in prov-dm) [2] and update 
> the grammar in prov-n [1].
>
> Paolo, can you update the example in [1]?
>
> Thanks,
> Luc
>
> [1] 
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-n.html#expression-Usage
> [2] 
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Usage
>
> On 05/24/2012 01:28 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>> Luc, Satya,
>>
>> This issue was reassigned to DM from the "dm-provrdf mapping" product.
>>
>> Where do we stand on this "asymmetry" between an optional activity on 
>> Generation but not Usage.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>> On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Satya,
>>> Then, the equivalent would be to make the entity of a usage optional 
>>> (i.e. the object of involvement).
>>> We can do it, if people feel it's appropriate.
>>> Luc
>>>
>>> On 06/03/2012 15:43, Satya Sahoo wrote:
>>>> Hi Luc,
>>>> The issue is about having activity id as optional for Generation 
>>>> and not for Usage - this is distinct from id of the Generation and 
>>>> Usage record id.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Satya
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Luc Moreau 
>>>> <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Hi,
>>>>
>>>>     Generation and usage have both optional id:
>>>>     http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Generation
>>>>     http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Usage
>>>>
>>>>     Luc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On 05/03/12 13:45, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping
>>>>         prov-dm<->  prov-o]
>>>>
>>>>         http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/288
>>>>
>>>>         Raised by: Satya Sahoo
>>>>         On product: mapping prov-dm<->  prov-o
>>>>
>>>>             If activity id is optional for generation record, why
>>>>         is it not so for usage record? These two points need to be
>>>>         reconciled either way. (Satya)
>>>>
>>>>             Similar to generation, time can be "folded" into the
>>>>         "attribute" list. (Satya)
>>>>
>>>>         http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Usage
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2012 10:13:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 May 2012 10:13:58 GMT