Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm]

This may not help, but just in case... I was thinking of suggesting:

    wasExcerptFrom

#g
--

On 14/05/2012 19:08, Daniel Garijo wrote:
> Hi all,
> It seemed like there was not enough consensus in the telecon past thursday
> about the last proposal.
> If I remember correctly, Tim and Jun voted -1 for prov:wasAQuoteFrom.
>
> So far, there have been the next proposals:
>
>     - quoted: there was no consensus because it could imply an agent instead
>     of an entity.
>     - wasQuoteOf: we started with this definition, and moved away because it
>     was confusing.
>     - hadQuoteFrom: there was no consensus because it could imply that the
>     quotation is partial.
>     - wasAQuoteFrom: there was no consensus because "if it was a quote, then
>     what is it now"?
>     - isAQuoteFrom/isQuoteFrom: there has been no votes on this one, but it
>     goes against having everything
>     in past tense.
>     - wasQuotedFrom: the current name and the only one I have concerns
>     about, because
>     the directionality of the property is not clear enough.
>
> Just a small remark: the issue is about the name of the property. The
> definition on DM is very clear.
>
> During today's prov-o telecon Tim said that he proposed to move away from
> wasQuoteOf in order
> to have something similar to wasDerivedFrom. I would be happy to go back to
> wasQuoteOf if there
> is no other suggestion.
>
> Thoughts, Jun, Tim?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
> 2012/5/8 Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>
>> **
>> good idea, we'll put it on Thursday's agenda
>>
>>
>> On 05/08/2012 03:20 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
>>
>> Hi Luc,
>> I still think that the name could be improved because the current one is
>> confusing.
>>
>> My last proposal ("wasAQuoteFrom") got a +1 from Stian and Paul
>> (although he said he would think of a better name). Nobody else said
>> anything,
>> so maybe we should ask the rest of the group on thursday?
>>
>> Best,
>> Daniel
>>
>> 2012/5/8 Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> I don't believe there was consensus to change the name of the relation as
>>> you suggested.
>>> We also have removed agents from this definition. Definition of
>>> quote/original attributes
>>> are as follows:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> quote: an identifier (e2) for the entity that represents the quote (the
>>> partial copy);
>>> original: an identifier (e1) for the original entity being quoted;
>>>
>>>   Can we close this issue?
>>> Cheers,
>>> Luc
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/19/2012 11:28 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>>
>>>> PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom
>>>> [prov-dm]
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/352
>>>>
>>>> Raised by: Daniel Garijo
>>>> On product: prov-dm
>>>>
>>>> Currently, the DM says:
>>>> A quotation record, written wasQuotedFrom(e2,e1,ag2,ag1,attrs) in
>>>> PROV-ASN, contains:
>>>>      quote: an identifier e2, identifying an entity record that
>>>> represents the quote;
>>>>      quoted: an identifier e1, identifying an entity record representing
>>>> what is being quoted;
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> However, if we say that e2 wasQuotedFrom e1 it may look like entity e1
>>>> is the one quoting e2 (since we are saying that e2 was quoted).
>>>>
>>>> I think it would be more clear if we rename the property with e2
>>>> wasQuoteOf e1, or e2 hadQuoteFrom e1.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>    --
>>> Professor Luc Moreau
>>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Professor Luc Moreau
>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>
>>
>

Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 19:57:53 UTC