W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 22:39:30 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|857c414186a5a2b92800482f77a5ae40o47MdZ08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FA99292.9040004@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Ivan,

Thanks for the pointer, I am now using
http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.rdf#WD
in the example.
Luc


On 07/05/12 14:58, Ivan Herman wrote:
> I see that the Prov-DM uses the W3C publication process as an example. Some of the terms referred to in the document actually exist, better use those:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.rdf
>
> I know it is a bit sketchy, and should be updated, but it is a start. There is at least a class for WD, PR, etc.
>
> Challenge: model the whole W3C publication process with Prov-O... looking at this what I tried to describe (and I did not really succeed) is to interpret things like: a some publications occur only when the W3C management agrees, on a transition call, that the document is fine for publication (which is the case for, eg, Candidate Recommendations...)
>
> Ivan
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:40:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 May 2012 21:40:00 GMT