- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:00:42 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Ivan, It's an interesting comment about modeling the process. It's important to remember we don't represent eventualities in provenance only what has happened. So we would only model that W3C management agrees and a publication occurs. We mention this somewhere but it's probably not clear enough… Paul On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > I see that the Prov-DM uses the W3C publication process as an example. Some of the terms referred to in the document actually exist, better use those: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.rdf > > I know it is a bit sketchy, and should be updated, but it is a start. There is at least a class for WD, PR, etc. > > Challenge: model the whole W3C publication process with Prov-O... looking at this what I tried to describe (and I did not really succeed) is to interpret things like: a some publications occur only when the W3C management agrees, on a transition call, that the document is fine for publication (which is the case for, eg, Candidate Recommendations...) > > Ivan > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 14:01:19 UTC