W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: unchewed gum and coupons

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:16:24 -0400
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <669DC4A3-594E-4F0E-92D5-FA6693461674@rpi.edu>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>

On Mar 30, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 15:55, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Inspired by the discussions on the "opposite of generation", I put together an RDF example that I think models the two kinds of "destruction/expiration" that fulfill the missing symmetric construct to Generation.
> 
> What does expiration mean in this example?
> 
> So the consumption means the entity can't be used/involved with
> anything after that - what is then the (later) expiration?

That the entity can't be used/involved with anything after the given time (independent of any consumption).

-Tim


> 
> -- 
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
> 
Received on Friday, 30 March 2012 13:17:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:59 GMT