W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: unchewed gum and coupons

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:05:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPRnXtm-V45OQPvXB2MgJ0g7fx3adW6iR6zphG--kqX64HPJpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 15:55, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:

> Inspired by the discussions on the "opposite of generation", I put together an RDF example that I think models the two kinds of "destruction/expiration" that fulfill the missing symmetric construct to Generation.

What does expiration mean in this example?

So the consumption means the entity can't be used/involved with
anything after that - what is then the (later) expiration?

-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 30 March 2012 13:06:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:59 GMT