W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Namespace for prov specs

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:12:46 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPRnXtnmnW+o=YQMboDF7rZFW0J-VYu+DvhP3RMkk9LM4F1fQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Sounds good to me. Not all tools are good enough to send the
appropriate Accept header, so would the default (when no HTML is
requested) be to go to the RDF/XML OWL file?


On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 08:09, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can we resolve the namespaces to be used for prov?
>
> This is ISSUE-256 ,  ISSUE-84 , ISSUE-224, ISSUE-281
>
> Here's the suggestion that seems to stem from the discussion
>
> Namespace is:
> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
>
> This dereferences to a landing page that points to prov-dm and prov-o if
> requesting html
>
> The landing page would like:
> - http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description#
> - or optionally be like the glossary given in
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/fd022426796d/model/prov-glossary.html
>
> Otherwise, conneg would be set to return the appropriate data file depending
> on the request.
>
> I.e .rdt / .ttl depending on the request
>
> See suggestion in ISSUE-281
>
> Is there any disagreement with this approach?
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>
>
>
>



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 22:13:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:59 GMT