W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model]

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:07:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPRnXtnsu-22RC7qiw6cqarZRcbowWTo+JSL4PETPB2Dpe1eCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:09, Stian Soiland-Reyes
<soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> I think this is the confusion over any of the 'optional' arguments in
> PROV-N. It is unclear if this means that the argument is implied (ie.
> existential quantification) or not applicable/present.  It might be
> good to go through all of the optionals in PROV-DM and make sure they
> make that clear. I'll raise that as an issue.

Tracker, this is ISSUE-311

https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/311

-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 11:07:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT