W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROPOSALS TO VOTE ON (deadline: Wednesday 14th, midnight GMT)

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:09:44 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|ecaf9f484495afeb736708c33aa6d255o2BA9m08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F5DCB68.3070707@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "Myers, Jim" <MYERSJ4@rpi.edu>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>

Hi Jim,

Maybe the example didn't make it clear enough.

The first entity was the one at http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/
entity(tr:prov-dm,[prov:type="working draft", ex:version="1"])
which is no longer version 1, when v2 comes out at the same url.

Luc


On 03/09/2012 07:24 PM, Myers, Jim wrote:
> I'm not so sure I like the examples though - version 1 doesn't become invalid/endOfLife when v2 comes out - v1 is still a valid entity that could have provenance (v1 is used to create v1.1 after v2 comes out...). Similarly, the entity representing the papers doesn't become something that has no provenance when it becomes unavailable - in fact I'd probably like to document what happened to it between when it went offline and when it reappeared. I think there are real entity ends that should be describable in the model, but these examples don't seem like good/valid uses to me.
>
>    
>> >  

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 10:10:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT