W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's "type" and "subtype" [Ontology]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:44:55 -0500
Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <04943DDE-BBB7-4F05-B17C-8BFFAC4E28D0@rpi.edu>
To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Thanks, Daniel.

The distinction between DM and prov-o's type has been well established.
I closed the issue.

-Tim

On Mar 6, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> after the latest changes to the DM, does this issue still hold?
> Thanks,
> Daniel
> 
> 2011/11/21 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
> 
> PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's "type" and "subtype" [Ontology]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/159
> 
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: Ontology
> 
> The DM mentions "type" and "subtype". Should/Does the PROV-O HTML explicitly state that these should be interpreted as rdf:type and rdfs:subClassOf?
> 
> This is a follow up from http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/144
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 19:53:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT