W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's "type" and "subtype" [Ontology]

From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:26:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CAExK0DehA+QH9EXJJWqYVhcOox7s87rEJXQL8N88ZNcMSFqmNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Tim,
after the latest changes to the DM, does this issue still hold?
Thanks,
Daniel

2011/11/21 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>

>
> PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's "type" and
> "subtype" [Ontology]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/159
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: Ontology
>
> The DM mentions "type" and "subtype". Should/Does the PROV-O HTML
> explicitly state that these should be interpreted as rdf:type and
> rdfs:subClassOf?
>
> This is a follow up from http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/144
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 19:26:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT