W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-114 (Tlebo): is prov:wasDerivedFrom rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:dependedOn? [Formal Model]

From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 17:14:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAExK0Dc7fMbcr4FFEnBg_wBApNEV-JH+RSTDm8yYgopoJP7azQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Tim,
I think this issue has already been addressed: wasDerivedFrom is a
subproperty of tracedTo.
Can it be closed?
Thanks,
Daniel

2011/10/20 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>

> I was just wondering if this decision needs to be made now?
>
> Can we not just get all the data model concepts reflected in the ontology?
>
> We can then add more sophisticated constraints later. For example, the
> data model as I read it does not have any hierarchy of derivation
> properties.
>
> cheers,
> Paul
>
> Satya Sahoo wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> Comments are interleaved.
>>
>>        However - dependedOn is transitive - but wasDerivedFrom is
>>        not. Can
>>        you be a subproperty and loose the transitivity?
>>
>>
>>    (Did anyone else answer this?)
>>
>>    Yes, I think so.
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> The current ProvenanceOntology.owl models wasDerivedFrom as subPropertyOf
>> dependedOn (also discussed in Issue-125). In addition,
>> wasEventuallyDerivedFrom is modeled as a subPropertyOf wasDerivedFrom.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best,
>> Satya
>>
>
>
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:15:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT