W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-114 (Tlebo): is prov:wasDerivedFrom rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:dependedOn? [Formal Model]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:27:35 -0500
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2D49CECE-5A8E-4F90-B91B-4444346764F1@rpi.edu>
To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
I just closed the issue, thanks.
Tim


On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> I think this issue has already been addressed: wasDerivedFrom is a subproperty of tracedTo.
> Can it be closed?
> Thanks,
> Daniel
> 
> 2011/10/20 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
> I was just wondering if this decision needs to be made now?
> 
> Can we not just get all the data model concepts reflected in the ontology?
> 
> We can then add more sophisticated constraints later. For example, the data model as I read it does not have any hierarchy of derivation properties.
> 
> cheers,
> Paul
> 
> Satya Sahoo wrote:
> Hi all,
> Comments are interleaved.
> 
>        However - dependedOn is transitive - but wasDerivedFrom is
>        not. Can
>        you be a subproperty and loose the transitivity?
> 
> 
>    (Did anyone else answer this?)
> 
>    Yes, I think so.
> 
> I agree.
> 
> The current ProvenanceOntology.owl models wasDerivedFrom as subPropertyOf dependedOn (also discussed in Issue-125). In addition, wasEventuallyDerivedFrom is modeled as a subPropertyOf wasDerivedFrom.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Best,
> Satya
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:39:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT