W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: New prov-o ontology!

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:37:17 -0500
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1688213A-3FF8-4B96-A218-D5C90DE7F2A4@rpi.edu>
To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Daniel,


On Feb 24, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:

> Hi all,
> this morning I've just updated the ontology and I see that it has changed a lot.
> 	 We have a Roled class. I don't remember having discussed this change.
> 	 Instantaneous event: I'm ok with that, since we discussed it on moday.
> 	 Activity is under "Durable". Why??
> 	 qualified has dissapeared, and we have "involved" range Element AND Involvement? (I think this is a typo, it should be the union).

I added qualified back in, I mistook qualified for the old qualifiable, which wasn't around long.

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/59419250de25


> 	 I'm still unhappy with the TemporalEntity name. What about just "Time", or "Temporal"?
> Now there are many classes with multiple parent classes, and there will be some unions. Will this be RL compliant?
> 
> 

The rest of your concerns were in response to Paolo's feedback, ISSUE-302 and we will handle it as part of that.

Regards,
Tim


> I haven't gone through all the mail discussions, since there were like 30 new this morning. But PLEASE, could we 
> have a wiki page or another ontology where we gather the feedback and discuss it within the prov-o team before
> implementing to the ontology? Tha last one we had may have had some issues, but it was much more simple
> and easy to read...
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniel
> 
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 15:50:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT