W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse

From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:09:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAExK0DeW2bYU3ycg=9B7kQ4oukUk3rmhSLaoJ32ruC8cEG+Xiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Luc,
Accounts are missing. According to what we discussed yesterday, they should
be part of the
universe of discourse.

If you consider accounts as Entities, then they would be included in
proposal 1 (along with Agents),
but some people argued that there could be cases of Accounts not being
Entities, so that's why I ask.

Thanks,
Daniel

2012/1/24 Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

> **
> All,
>
> Paul and I have a strong desire to resolve the issue related to
> identifiers before F2F2.
>
> For information, we agreed on the following last week:
> *    *All* objects of discourse ("entities") MUST be identifiable by all
> participants in discourse. Object descriptions ("entity records" and
> otherwise)     SHOULD use an unambiguous identifier (either reusing an
> existing identifier, or introducing a new identifier) for the objects
> described." (intent) *
>
> So, the next challenge (ISSUE-225) is to agree on the objects that belong
> to universe of discourse.
> To facilitate the call on Thursday, we are putting forward a series of
> proposals. Can
> you express your support or not in the usual manner.   On Thursday we
> will  discuss
> proposals for which we didn't reach consensus.
>
> Regards,
> Luc
>
> Proposal 1: Entities and Activities belong to the universe of discourse.
>
> Proposal 2: Events (Entity Usage event, Entity Generation Event,
> Activity Start Event, Activity End event) belong to the universe of
> discourse
>
> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains,
> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation,
> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After
> removal belong to the universe of discourse.
>
> Proposal 4: AlternateOf and SpecializationOf belong to the universe of
> discourse
>
> Proposal 5: Records do not belong to the Universe of discourse
>             This includes Account Record.
>
> Proposal 6: Things do no belong to the universe of discourse
>   Note
>
> Proposal 7: Note/hasAnnotation do not belong to the universe of discourse
>
> Proposal 8: Event ordering constraints do not belong to the universe of
> discourse.
>
> Proposal 9: Attributes do not belong to the universe of discourse.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 14:10:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC