W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

[owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:01:35 -0400
Message-Id: <B5397900-19B1-48A1-8179-EAF39CF5BE10@rpi.edu>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/0b0dfa4bfb9b


On Apr 26, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote:

> Stephan,
> 
> On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:11 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> 
>> PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/367
>> 
>> Raised by: Stephan Zednik
>> On product: Ontology
>> 
>> 1) There are two domains defined for prov:hadActivity
>> 
>> - prov:Involvement
>> - the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility
>> 
>> from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_domain
>> 
>> Where a property P has more than one rdfs:domain property, then the resources denoted by subjects of triples with predicate P are instances of all the classes stated by the rdfs:domain properties.
> 
> Agreed. Both domains hold for all subjects that use the property.
> The simpler domain is for RL compatibility, and the union is for RL++ use.
> They do not contradict.
> 
>> 
>>> From what I can tell this means the domain is the intersection of prov:Involvement with the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility, which is just the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility since both are subclasses of prov:Involvement.
> 
> Correct.
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2) annotations on prov:hadActivity
>> 
>> - it appears that the domain has been relaxed to be a union of Derivation and Responsibility, so I think we can remove the prov:todo annotation
> 
> done
> 
>> 
>> - The rdfs:comment is currently "The activity generating the the derived entity and using the derived-from entity".  I think this should be updated to reflect the relaxed domain.  What does it mean when a qualified Responsibility hadActivity?
>> 
> 
> DM says:
> 
> derivation:
> activity: an optional identifier (a) for the activity using and generating the above entities;
> 
> invalidation:
> activity: an optional identifier for the activity that invalidated the entity;
> 
> responsibility:
> activity: an optional identifier (a) of an activity for which the responsibility link holds;
> 
> 
> PROV-O comment was:
> 
> The activity generating the derived entity and using the derived-from entity.
> 
> PROV-O comment changed to:
> 
> Optional: The Activity that is part of the Involvement, which used, generated, invalidated, or was the responsibility of some Entity.
> 
> -Tim
> 
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 15:02:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 15:02:07 GMT