W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April.

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:53:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPRnXt=fh8=+ok6wrjw=NH4Mt1Cj=qhx0FmZxQ1sCFSQX6BjAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 15:24, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:

> I think this also brings up a more general question, Stian.
> With the ease of "toggling" properties around the hierarchy, it would be nice to have owl:Annotations that justify why one is a sub prop of another, referencing the appropriate dm or dm-constraints anchors.

You can describe that easily, in Protege it's just a click away on the
relation - but this was another thing that brought us out of OWL-RL I
think.

-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Monday, 23 April 2012 08:54:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT