W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-342 (location-of-usage): prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity - others okay? [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:30:29 +0000
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EMEW3|0b1f1ad7c81bce896861b8d1a1b075d5o3A5Uy08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|8138DD35-7FD9-4E04-A2A8-D22158E66ACB@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Hi Tim,

I don't think there has been suggestion that the location attribute applies to other classes. You are making a good case for usage and generation.

What else? Everything? Note sure this works for Quotation, OriginalSource, Attribution, Association, Responsibility ....


Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton 
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

On 10 Apr 2012, at 22:58, "Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> PROV-ISSUE-342 (location-of-usage): prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity - others okay? [prov-dm]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/342
> 
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: prov-dm
> 
> 4.7.4.2 prov:location
> 
> states:
> 
> "The attribute prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity. "
> 
> does this imply that it is NOT an attribute of any other class?
> 
> I imagine that it might be useful to specify the location of a usage, which would be more specific than the location of the using activity. e.g., "The party happened at Sarah's. The cake was cut with a knife in the kitchen." To mention "kitchen" for the usage, prov:location seems natural.
> 
> Is it acceptable to view the DM's current statement as non-restrictive?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 04:31:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT