W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: is specializationOf transitive or not?

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:06:21 +0100
Message-ID: <4F7ABD8D.20207@ninebynine.org>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Yes, I think it's transitive.

#g
--

On 02/04/2012 11:18, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The purpose of this email is to seek some clarification on what people think
> about the transitive nature of specializationOf.
>
> James' semantics [1] defines this relation as transitive.
>
> Do you think specializationOf is transitive?
> If not, can you give a counter example?
>
> Cheers,
> Luc
>
> PS: tracker, this is ISSUE-29
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/FormalSemanticsWD3
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 13:23:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT