- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:06:21 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Yes, I think it's transitive. #g -- On 02/04/2012 11:18, Luc Moreau wrote: > > All, > > The purpose of this email is to seek some clarification on what people think > about the transitive nature of specializationOf. > > James' semantics [1] defines this relation as transitive. > > Do you think specializationOf is transitive? > If not, can you give a counter example? > > Cheers, > Luc > > PS: tracker, this is ISSUE-29 > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/FormalSemanticsWD3 >
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 13:23:01 UTC