Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model

I think, Paolo, also suggested PROV-SW.



Paolo Missier wrote:
> don't mind PROV-O,
> although PROV-OM is more consistent with PROV-DM
> -Paolo
>
>
> On 10/10/11 10:12 PM, Eric Stephan wrote:
>> +1 PROV-O - rhymes with "bravo!" :-)
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Jim McCusker<mccusj@rpi.edu>   wrote:
>>> In the OWL call today we seemed to settle on PROV-O (Provenance Ontology),
>>> since it's pronounceable and simple. Yes, it's a city name, but that hasn't
>>> stopped other ontologies in the past.
>>> Jim
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Groth<p.t.groth@vu.nl>   wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Given that we no longer want to call the provenance ontology "the formal
>>>> model" we wanted another name:
>>>>
>>>> Here are some proposals:
>>>>
>>>> PROV Ontology Model (also PROV ontology)
>>>> PROV-Onto
>>>> PROV Vocabulary
>>>>
>>>> Please send your suggestion/endorsement/thoughts in on this thread. We
>>>> will try and get consensus this week.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>