W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:27:53 +0200
Message-ID: <4E93FE09.5010004@vu.nl>
To: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I think, Paolo, also suggested PROV-SW.



Paolo Missier wrote:
> don't mind PROV-O,
> although PROV-OM is more consistent with PROV-DM
> -Paolo
>
>
> On 10/10/11 10:12 PM, Eric Stephan wrote:
>> +1 PROV-O - rhymes with "bravo!" :-)
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Jim McCusker<mccusj@rpi.edu>   wrote:
>>> In the OWL call today we seemed to settle on PROV-O (Provenance Ontology),
>>> since it's pronounceable and simple. Yes, it's a city name, but that hasn't
>>> stopped other ontologies in the past.
>>> Jim
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Groth<p.t.groth@vu.nl>   wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Given that we no longer want to call the provenance ontology "the formal
>>>> model" we wanted another name:
>>>>
>>>> Here are some proposals:
>>>>
>>>> PROV Ontology Model (also PROV ontology)
>>>> PROV-Onto
>>>> PROV Vocabulary
>>>>
>>>> Please send your suggestion/endorsement/thoughts in on this thread. We
>>>> will try and get consensus this week.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 08:30:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:44 GMT