Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model

Paul

this was briefly discussed in the OWL call yesterday, and dismissed as "too general" (Satya et al. feel free to correct me)

-Paolo

On 10/11/11 9:27 AM, Paul Groth wrote:
> I think, Paolo, also suggested PROV-SW.
>
>
>
> Paolo Missier wrote:
>> don't mind PROV-O,
>> although PROV-OM is more consistent with PROV-DM
>> -Paolo
>>

Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 08:41:45 UTC