W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Definitions and provenance and invariance

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:26:27 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTimRdnUQSRvyLkH-Eu0sVVadX3xz0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
I tried at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptInvariantViewOnThing#Comment_by_Stian__24_June_2011
- but I think I confused myself by bringing in too much. :-)

We earlier talked about something simple like:

 rectangle A may have varying length and width, whereas B, an IVP of
A, may have a invariant area



On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:22, Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>  following a suggestion by Simon in the latest telecon: to help with the
> understanding by those not formerly involved, and more importantly with the
> synthesis process by the Model TF:
> can those who voted for the "further simplification" version please provide
> (on the wiki) one example each that illustrates:
> - A
> - B
> - "stuff"
> - "stuff state"
> - "correspondence"
> - "consistency"
>
> I went through the entire thread that led to this, and I still don't get it,
> sorry!
>
> -Paolo
>
>
>
>



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 10:27:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:32 GMT