W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Definitions and provenance and invariance

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:07:27 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTikTjcnQRYhy0kO+M-xGBE5WVmp5cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 17:06, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> Following comments, I have tried to simplify the definitions of 'thing' and
> 'IVP of'  further.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptInvariantViewOnThing#Further_simplification

+1 with the qualification of correspondence, for instance:

The asserter is free to choose what "corresponding properties" above
means. The corresponding properties might match many-to-many, eg.
rectangle A may have varying length and width, whereas B, an IVP of A,
may have a invariant area.



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 10:08:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT