W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Definitions and provenance and invariance

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:06:37 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|945309d019d509be15524ba601f9e926n5JH6f08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4DFF700D.3060807@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi all,

Following comments, I have tried to simplify the definitions of 'thing' 
and 'IVP of'  further.

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptInvariantViewOnThing#Further_simplification

What do you think? If we are happy with this simplification, we should 
try to
get a coherent set of definitions for Generation/Use/Derivation.

Best regards,
Luc


On 06/20/2011 02:42 PM, Graham Klyne wrote:
> Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>> From this I'm not sure if "dynamic resource" is useful as a
>> classification, I would go for Luc's view (and our accepted
>> definition) that invariance is just a relation [...]
>
> This would appear to be a consensus!
>
> #g
>
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 16:07:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT