W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: Consensus reached - process execution duration

From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:14:14 +0200
Message-ID: <4DF5F106.5050107@gmail.com>
To: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>

Hi All,

We have consensus on the following definition:

"A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval. 
Statements denoting this duration are optional."

Thanks to all those who voted.

Paul

Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 11:14:52 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Garijo: "Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration"
Previous message: James Cheney: "Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration"
In reply to: James Cheney: "Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration"
Next in thread: Daniel Garijo: "Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT