W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:24:29 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTin_rSCL=QJxy7zhYTw6GEHdkRO-ig@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
+1

2011/6/13 James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>

> +1
>
> --James
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Paul Groth wrote:
>
>  Hi All,
>>
>> In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following
>> proposal:
>>
>> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
>>
>> However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all process
>> executions to specify a duration.
>>
>> I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
>>
>> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval.
>> Statements denoting this duration are optional."
>>
>> In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
>> this proposal?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 11:25:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT