W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:23:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4DF1E28D.9080203@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
+1

Looks good to me.

Jun

On 10/06/2011 10:14, Khalid Belhajjame wrote:
>
> +1
>
> khalid
>
> On 09/06/2011 21:27, Paul Groth wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following
>> proposal:
>>
>> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
>>
>> However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all
>> process executions to specify a duration.
>>
>> I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
>>
>> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval.
>> Statements denoting this duration are optional."
>>
>> In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
>> this proposal?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 09:23:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT