W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

From: <creed@opengeospatial.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:03:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <d67ca9de9ac9c524233b530ec1190100.squirrel@mail.opengeospatial.org>
To: "Paul Groth" <pgroth@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1

>
> +1
>
> khalid
>
> On 09/06/2011 21:27, Paul Groth wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following
>> proposal:
>>
>> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
>>
>> However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all
>> process executions to specify a duration.
>>
>> I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
>>
>> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval.
>> Statements denoting this duration are optional."
>>
>> In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
>> this proposal?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:03:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT