- From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 08:46:50 +0200
- To: Paolo Missier <paolo.missier@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C Prov <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
Hi Paolo It's an open web so anybody can do an extension and post it. What we have as official comes from the authority of the W3C process. Paul > On May 19, 2015, at 22:32, Paolo Missier <paolo.missier@newcastle.ac.uk> wrote: > > Greetings, > > simple and naive question: is there (or should there be) any validation or even “certification” process for PROV extensions? Can anyone who designs an extension claim to have done so correctly with impunity? In fact, should there be a repository of “official” extensions (if that has any meaning give the above)? > > Thanks, > -Paolo > > > > ==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==- > Dr. Paolo Missier — Lecturer, Data and Information Management Home: http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier > Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org Twitter:https://twitter.com/PMissier > School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, UK LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/paolo-missier > =- Observe, Interpret, Understand, Act. Repeat -= Visual stories: http://scattidistratti.smugmug.com/ >
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 06:47:21 UTC