Re: what is a valid PROV extension?

Hi,

as I see it, as long as the PROV-Constraints are not contradicted by an
extension, I would say it qualifies as "valid".

We have a wiki page that anyone can edit:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV
Maybe we could keep track of externsions there?

Tom


2015-05-20 8:46 GMT+02:00 Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>:

> Hi Paolo
>
> It's an open web so anybody can do an extension and post it. What we have
> as official comes from the authority of the W3C process.
>
> Paul
>
>
> > On May 19, 2015, at 22:32, Paolo Missier <paolo.missier@newcastle.ac.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > simple and naive question: is there (or should there be) any validation
> or even “certification” process for PROV extensions? Can anyone who designs
> an extension claim to have done so correctly with impunity? In fact, should
> there be a repository of “official” extensions (if that has any meaning
> give the above)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >  -Paolo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-
> > Dr. Paolo Missier   — Lecturer, Data and Information Management
>      Home: http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
> > Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
>                  Twitter:https://twitter.com/PMissier
> > School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
>                  LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/paolo-missier
> > =- Observe, Interpret, Understand, Act. Repeat -=
>                       Visual stories: http://scattidistratti.smugmug.com/
> >
>
>