W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-comments@w3.org > October 2012

Re: PROV response to comment on bundles and ids

From: Satrajit Ghosh <satra@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 08:51:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+A4wOkNxSnRkuZpV584aCrugZzu532LBTvKthQ36dy+kWDR6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Cc: public-prov-comments@w3.org
thanks for the clarification. i think it would be useful to add the
following invalid example as well unless the following is indeed valid.

 prefix ex <http://example.org/>
 bundle ex:b1
    entity(ex:e1, ...someattr1...)
    entity(ex:e1, ...someattr2...)

on a side note, this is the first time i'm seeing the Document/endDocument
construct, why not another Bunde/endBundle?



On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:

> Hi Satra,
> Thanks for your active engagement with helping improve W3C PROV. We have
> taken a look at your comment:
> "if one were implementing a database storing prov bundles, would we have
> to ensure that IDs don't clash in the database insertion code? or is
> the understanding that IDs are only meant to be unique within a given
> bundle context?"
> You can find our response here:
> 1.1.33 ISSUE-482 (Bundles and IDs)<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-482_.28Bundles_and_IDs.29>
> As part of the W3C process, we need to have an acknowledgement from you
> that our response solves your comment or if not a bit of description as to
> why. Could you provide that for us?
> Thanks again for all your help,
> Paul
> --
> --
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
>   Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
> - The Network Institute
> VU University Amsterdam
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2012 12:52:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 27 October 2012 12:52:37 GMT