W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-comments@w3.org > November 2012

Fwd: PROV-WG response to comment on constraints

From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:55:18 -0500
To: public-prov-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <FF591D32-8C31-4352-A56C-4252A6F5166D@inf.ed.ac.uk>
('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Reza Samavi <reza.samavi@utoronto.ca>
> Date: November 9, 2012 11:22:45 AM EST
> To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: Fwd: PROV-WG response to comment on constraints
> 
> Hi James,
> 
> I acknowledge that the response as it stands addresses the concerns. As pointed out by the group the constraints are not completely and explicitly expressed, whether this incompleteness affect the adaptation of the model it's a matter of debate and probably future work. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Reza
> 
> On 12-11-09 10:45 AM, James Cheney wrote:
>> 
>> I am forwarding your response to the WG public comments mailing list so that we can record it as an acknowledgement.  We are going to close the issue now, but please let me know if you have any further comments and I'll try to accommodate them.
>> 
>> --James
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Reza Samavi <reza.samavi@utoronto.ca>
>>> Date: November 5, 2012 3:04:54 PM EST
>>> To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
>>> Subject: Re: PROV-WG response to comment on constraints
>>> 
>>> Hi James,
>>> 
>>> Sure I'll do it before Friday.
>>> 
>>> Reza
>>> 
>>> On 12-11-05 2:56 PM, James Cheney wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi again Reza,
>>>> 
>>>> I just wanted to point out (in case you missed it at the bottom of the email below) that we would appreciate an acknowledgement of the WG's handling of your comment, which is required as part of the W3C process for recommendation-track documents.  We have a working group face-to-face meeting coming up this Friday and Saturday.  It would be very helpful if you could acknowledge the working group's response, and indicate whether it addressed your concern, before the meeting.
>>>> 
>>>> --James
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 1, 2012, at 5:24 PM, James Cheney wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Reza,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm writing on behalf of the Provenance Working Group with the group's response to your feedback. Paul Groth, who handled your comment originally, is traveling at the moment.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for your active engagement with helping improve W3C PROV. We have taken a look at your comment, in the email archived here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2012Sep/0002.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> which was made into a tracked issue on the PROV-CONSTRAINTS document here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/556
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can find our response here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1.6.1 ISSUE-556 (time-qualification)
>>>>> 
>>>>> As part of the W3C process, we need to have an acknowledgement from you that our response solves your comment or if not a bit of description as to why. Could you provide that for us?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks again for all your help,
>>>>> --James
>>>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.



The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 16:55:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 November 2012 16:55:55 GMT