Paul, I think the semantics of 'supersededBy' are different to 'wasRevisionOf'. When something is superseded it no longer should be referred to. Whereas when something is a revision of something else all versions my still be valid. We see this in many document-centric environments. For example at NASA, a specification for telemetry and commanding of vehicles existed in a number of concurrently valid revisions (REV A, REV B, etc.). Each revision having justification in specific contexts-of-use. Moreover 'supersedes' and 'supersededBy' are very commonly used at W3C. Ralph Hodgson, @ralphtq Mobile Phone: +1 781-789-1664 CTO, TopQuadrant, @TopQuadrant Blog: Voyages of the Semantic Enterprise Newspapers: SPARQL, SemanticWeb, LinkedData On Nov 2, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ralph, > > Would wasRevisionOf be of use? We do not have supersedes. > > Paul > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Ralph TQ [Gmail] <rhodgson@topquadrant.com> wrote: > When a unit in QUDT is superseded by another we use a property, voag:supersededBy, from the VOAG ontology. I could not find a corresponding property in the PROV ontology. > > Ralph Hodgson, @ralphtq > > CTO, TopQuadrant, @TopQuadrant > > Blog: Voyages of the Semantic Enterprise > > Newspapers: SPARQL, SemanticWeb, LinkedData > > > > > >Received on Monday, 5 November 2012 18:08:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 November 2012 18:08:33 GMT