Re: strategies for getting more eyes on new standards

I agree, I think it reasonable to ask of anyone/any-group asking for a privacy review that they fill this out.

> On Apr 28, 2016, at 10:56 , Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> So I've been thinking a lot about how to get more eyes on new standards when people reach out to PING.
> 
> One possibility might be to ask spec authors (or someone from the spec's WG) to first try using the privacy questionnaire[1] I've been working on.
> 
> This way, we can shrink the gulf of execution required to participate in privacy reviews, as well as get some feedback from spec authors on how the questionnaire can be improved.
> 
> 
> What does the group think of this?
> 
> [1] https://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/
> 
> /********************************************/
> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
> Staff Technologist
> Center for Democracy & Technology
> District of Columbia office
> (p) 202-637-9800
> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt
> 
> /*******************************************/

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Thursday, 28 April 2016 20:58:46 UTC